Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Helis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 1, 1939No. 35221PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice. ’

The plaintiff, alleging that he is a judgment creditor of the defendant, instituted this action, praying for the recognition and enforcement, under the “Full Faith and Credit Clause” (Art. IV, Sec. I) of the United States Constitution, U.S.C.A. and ■the Act of Congress passed pursuant to'its provisions (28 U.S.C.A. § 687), on May 26, 1790, of a final judgment of the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, for the sum of $10,472.75, with interest thereon at the rate of 7% per annum from October 7, 1929, until paid.

The defendant filed exceptions of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. CarrollLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Park v. MarkleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Stephens Photo, Inc. v. Southern Portraits, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Park v. MarkleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API