Schlake v. MacConnell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
The Consolidated Concessions Company, a defunct corporation, and its trustees, have appealed from two orders of the trial court, one of which set aside the default of plaintiff to a so-called cross-complaint filed iby said appellants and the other order struck from the files the said cross-complaint. The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the appellants have no standing in the action, as it was dismissed as to them prior to the filing of the purported answer and cross-complaint and their petition to intervene in said action was denied by the trial court, which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Barber v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Whitehead v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Osment v. McelrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Pfister v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Butchart v. MoorheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dabney v. ShippeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Contract Engineers, Inc. v. California-Doran Heat Treating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.