Legal Opinion
Bradner v. Vasquez
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1951No. Civ. 17761PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered pursuant to an order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants to plaintiff’s second amended complaint in an action to recover attorney’s fees. Plaintiff died after the appeal was perfected and the executrix of his will has been substituted in his place.
The second amended complaint alleged these facts. Plaintiff is an attorney at law. On November 10, 1941, plaintiff and defendants entered into the following written contract: “Mr. & Mrs. Anselmo M. Yasquez 3161 Winter Street Los Angeles
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Yasquez:
“Relative to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Ehrenworth v. . Stuhmer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Asmus v. Pacific BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Healy Tibbets Construction Co. v. Employers' Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. Surety Bond Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Lawrence v. ShuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.