Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Bishop

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1949No. Civ. 14011PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

The appellant sued to quiet title to a piece of residential property on Gault Street in the city of Santa Cruz. The complaint alleged that it was the community property of appellant and Mary M. Tompkins at the time of her death and that appellant’s claim thereto was based on his status as surviving spouse. Respondent Ernest L. Bishop was a son, and respondent Pearl Humphrey a daughter of Mrs. Tompkins by her former marriage. Respondents’ answer denied the allegations of the complaint and alleged that on May 5,1947, Mary M. Tompkins deeded an undivided one-half interest in the property to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Grolemund v. CafferataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Dunn v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Shaw v. BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Estate of Young v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  3. Gabaig v. GabaigAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bernatas v. HonnertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. In Re Marriage of GriniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API