Legal Opinion

D.N.S. v. Schattman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1997No. 2-96-277-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

In this original proceeding, relator D.N.S., M.D. (Dr. S.) 1 seeks mandamus relief on an order by the trial court that requires Dr. S. to produce to Michael Anderson, the real party in interest, a narrative report. Dr. S. had prepared the narrative report at the request of, and had sent it to, his professional liability insurer after Anderson had sent Dr. S. notice of a healthcare liability claim. Because the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the production of the privileged narrative report, we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus.

Background

And…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Tullis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. DeBord v. Circle Y of Yoakum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. in Re City of DickinsonTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API