Legal Opinion

Ross v. Smith & Bloxom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1919No. 15222PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King. County, Davidson, J., entered September 20, .1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian struck by an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained by him, alleging and proving substantially the following facts: At the time of the accident, which occurred at the intersection of Madison street and Western avenue, in the city of Seattle, respondent stood on the sidewalk at the southeast corner of the intersection of the streets mentioned, engaged in conversation with friends. A Ford automobile, owned and driven by defendant Stereos,' came down Western avenue from the north, at a speed estimated all the way from twelve to thirty-five miles per hour. At the same time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Johnson v. Northwestern Tel. Exch. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Bullis v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Strojny v. Griffin Wheel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1904

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bracy v. LundWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stoneman v. Wick Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Swanson v. GilpinWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Dodge v. SalingerWashington Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API