Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 12, 2006No. 06-310PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant Henry Morgan appeals the order of the circuit court setting aside an attorney’s Hen filed by him and a second order authorizing payment of attorney’s fees to class counsel. Morgan contends on appeal that the dismissal of his attorney’s lien was improper. On cross-appeal, appellees Don Chandler, individually and on behalf of the class, and Lenders Title Company (referred to jointly hereinafter as “Chandler”) claim attorney’s fees from Morgan for filing a nonjusticiable claim. We affirm on direct appeal and on cross-appeal.
On October 31, 2005, Morgan filed a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Ward v. DossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Carson v. County of DrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Lenders Title Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Lenders Title Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. EisenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- Grand Valley Ridge, LLC v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Morgan v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- XTO Energy, Inc. v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Harwell-Williams v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.