Legal Opinion

Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & Organ

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 21, 1998No. 97-828PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a per se compensable injury under the Workers’ Compensation Act, or whether a claimant must prove that it was caused by rapid repetitive motion. The Workers’ Compensation Commission, interpreting the Act to require proof of rapid repetitive motion, denied benefits to appellant Lilly Kildow for CTS, which she contends resulted from her job activities at Baldwin Piano Company. The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed the Commission’s decision in part, and remanded the case for an award of benefits.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Mountain Home School District No. 9 v. T.M.J. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Leathers v. CottonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Locke v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Social Work Licensing Board v. MoncebaizSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Green v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Edens v. Superior Marble & GlassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API