Legal Opinion

Weiss v. American Honda Finance Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 16, 2004No. 04-617PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Appellant Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration (DF&A) appeals the partial summary judgment entered by the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Sixth Division, wherein the circuit court found that the complaint was not barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity and that Honda is a “taxpayer” for the purposes of Ark. Code Ann. § 26-52-309 (Repl. 1997), which is commonly known as the “Bad Debt Statute.” We hold that the circuit court erred in finding that Honda is a taxpayer under the “Bad Debt Statute” and entitled to a refund. This is an appeal required by law to be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Burcham v. City of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Stephens v. Arkansas School for the BlindSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Ozark Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kyzar v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Comcast of Little Rock, Inc. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Citifinancial Retail Services Division of Citicorp Trust Bank, FSB v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Michael W. Gates and Susan J. Gates v. Jim Hudson, Secretary, Department of Finance and Administration of the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
  5. K.N. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API