Legal Opinion

Trabucco v. Sorrels

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1931No. Docket No. 4177PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

A rehearing was granted in this cause, not by reason of any doubt as to the correctness of the conclusions heretofore reached, but for the purpose of restraining and setting forth excerpts from the testimony contained in the transcript showing that the findings of the trial court are sufficiently supported. With this in view we follow in the main the language of the original opinion.

The plaintiffs had judgment against the defendants in an action of ejectment involving the ownership of the east half of the southwest quarter of section 13,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kimball v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Churchill Co. v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Butler v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Verdi Development Co. v. Dono-Han Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API