Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Oltarsh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
Respondent, Classic Dresses, Inc., is a manufacturer of dresses. Appellants, four in number, are partners engaged in the business of selling textiles under the name of J. Oltarsh. In 1936 the parties entered into four separate agreements for the purchase and sale of certain silk materials. Each of these contracts contained the following clause: “ All controversies arising out of or relating to the contract or any modification thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the Silk Association of America, Inc., or its successors.”
A controversy between the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re the Arbitration of E. Richard Meinig Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- In Re the Arbitration of the E. Richard Meinig Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Franks & Penn-Uranium Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Ench Equipment Corp. v. Enkay Foods, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Bernson Silk Mills v. M. S. Siegel & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re the Arbitration of Certain Differences between Orange Pulp & Paper Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re the Arbitration between Dembitzer & GutchenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.