Legal Opinion
Bernson Silk Mills v. M. S. Siegel & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 6, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
In December, 1937, M. S. Siegel & Company, Inc., the respondent, placed with Bernson Silk Mills, the petitioner, an order for a quantity of printed silk. The order was oral, but the petitioner alleges that the contract was reduced to writing and a copy delivered to and retained by the respondent. The writing contained a provision for arbitration of all controversies relating to the contract. The silk was delivered on or about January 3, 1938. Subsequently a dispute arose as to the quality of the merchandise and the respondent’s obligation to pay for it. The petitioner then demanded…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of A.E. Fire Ins. Co. v. N.J. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Schafran & Finkel, Inc. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- In re Exeter Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- In re the Arbitration between OltarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anthony Drugs of Bethpage, Inc. v. Local 1199 Drug & Hospital UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- In re the Arbitration Between Wesley Simpson, Inc. & Joyce Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Bernson Silk Mills, Inc. v. M. S. Siegel & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re the Arbitration between Arthur Philip Export Corp. & Leathertone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949