Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Franks & Penn-Uranium Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The respondents-appellants moved at Special Term during the pendency of an arbitration proceeding and in advance of the making of an award for an order to remove and disqualify the arbitrators for misconduct.
*40The ground of misconduct specified in the moving papers is a suggestion made by one of the arbitrators after the proceeding was under way that both parties give consideration to increasing the fees of the arbitrators which had previously been stipulated, because the arbitrators were finding the proceeding more onerous than they had contemplated.
The notice of motion at Special Term…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re the Arbitration between Friedman & FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- In re the Arbitration between OltarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Fischer & Queens Telephone Secretary, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Montague Pipeline Technologies Corp. v. Grace-Lansing & Grace Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Siegel v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In Matter of Double-M Constr. Corp. v. Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- City of Albany v. Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.