Legal Opinion

Noble v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1924No. 4193PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called the defendants, were convicted under an indictment which charged them, as officers of the Commercial National Bank of Great Falls, Mont., with violation of section 5209, Rev. Stat., as amended by section 7 of the Act of September 26, 1918, 40 Stat. 972 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 9772). They were each found guilty under numerous counts, and on each count each defendant was sentenced to pay a fine and to be imprisoned 30 months, the terms of imprisonment to *690run concurrently. It follows that, if they were legally convicted on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Dodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. Hagen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Milton Cureton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Lovvorn v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Ah Fook Chang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. State v. SorrellArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. LaytonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API