Hagen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Ed Hagen, Ed Carey, Walter F. Patton, and Dick Russell. Judgment of conviction, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
G1UBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were convicted of a conspiracy to violate section 35 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10199), by stealing certain intoxicating liquors belonging to and in the possession of the United States. The indictment charged that the conspiracy was entered into by the plaintiffs in error and four others, to wit, Locknaue, Morrison, Smart, and Tom Russell, on or about March 22, 1919, and that it was a continuing one. The indictment set forth two overt acts: First, the taking of a certain portion of the liquor on the night of March 29; and, second, the taking…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Dodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- United States v. CassidyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Lovvorn v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Ah Fook Chang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.