Legal Opinion
Ah Fook Chang v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 1937No. 8352PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were indicted for violating the Narcotic Drugs, Import and Export Act, as amended (21 U.S.C.A. § 171 et seq.), m one count, and for violating the Harrison Narcotic Act (38 Stat. 785), as amended, in the second count. They have appealed from the judgment after conviction on both counts.
On December 18, 1935, appellant Robert Chang was accosted by Hilo policemen of Hawaii county, and was told that they wished to look in his room. The officers were accompanied by a federal investigator with the alcohol tax unit in Hilo, Hawaii. Without a warrant the room was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Shields v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- United States v. Santos Charles, Jr. And Steven McAninchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- United States v. Melvin Reynolds and Herbert BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.