Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Mangum
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. R. E. Beckham.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This action was brought by the appellee to recover from the railway company and its co-defendant Ginocchio on account of an injury alleged to have been received by him by reason of a defective door step, which was placed at the entrance of an eating house owned and kept by Ginocchio.
*344The house in which Ginocchio was keeping a hotel or restaurant was on ground leased to him by the railway company for the period of twenty years, with a view to have thereon a house erected for the accommodation of the traveling public. The house was erected by Ginocchio under plans…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dungan v. Von PuhlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by57 opinions
- Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Pittsburg Water Heater Co. v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Connor v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Burner v. Higman & Skinner Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.