New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Ault
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Wells Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Action by Catherine Ault against Tbe New York, Chicago and St. Louis Eailroad Company. Prom a judgment for Aaintiffi, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, C. J.
Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for personal injuries. The complaint is in two paragraphs, the first of which charges that the servants of appellant wilfully and intentionally injured appellee in the management and operation of the locomotive and ears of appellant. The second paragraph is based upon the alleged negligence of appellant’s servants in the operation of such locomotive and cars.
1. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the second paragraph of complaint, and this is the first question we will consider. The allegations of this paragraph disclose that appellee, at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Clark v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PritchardIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Evansville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. SpiegelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Public Utilities Co. v. HandorfIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Evansville Railways Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Waters v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Richard Roberts v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965