Legal Opinion

Waters v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1916No. 22,753PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Johnson Circuit Court; W. E. Deupree, Judge. Action by Philip O. Waters, administrator of the estate of Mary Eliza Waters, deceased, against the Indianapolis Traction and Terminal Company. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court •under §1399 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 569.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

— Action by appellant for the death of Mary Eliza Waters, wife of the administrator. A *529trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee. Error is here -asserted because of the giving of certain instructions and the refusal to give others requested. The record does not contain the evidence. The appeal was taken under the proviso of §691 Burns 1914, §650 R. S. 1881, reading as follows: “That. when in any case an appeal is prosecuted upon the question of the correctness of instructions given or refused, or the modifications thereof, it shall not be necessary to set out in the record…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Balzer v. WaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. King v. Inland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Red Men's Fraternal Accident Ass'n of America v. RippeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Tecker v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cowin v. Sears-Roebuck and Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Zollman v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Jones v. BeasleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Maxey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Union Traction Co. v. Ringer, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API