Legal Opinion
United States v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided June 21, 1983No. M80-12CA2, G80-818CA7PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILES, Chief Judge.
These two cases were consolidated by stipulation for the purpose of hearing and resolving common issues of law only. Each defendant has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They contend that the United States has no right of recovery against them under the Medical Care Recovery Act (MCRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2651, et seq. (1976), or Michigan’s no-fault automobile insurance statute, Mich. Comp.Laws § 500.3101, et seq. (1983), for medical services it provided injured…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Heusle v. National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Tom York, D/B/A York's Mobil Service, and John HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Dairyland Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Sanner v. Government Employees Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance v. AndujarDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. PerryDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1995
- United States v. SpencleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
- United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984