Legal Opinion

Mauck v. Melton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

This was an action for the partition of two forty-acre tracts of land in Harrison county, by Mary Mauck and her husband, George Mauck, against Lavisa Melton and her husband, Daniel Melton, Daniel T. Gilmore and Mollie Gilmore.

The complaint alleged, that Mary Gilmore, who was the mother of the said Mary and Lavisa and the grandmother of the said Daniel T. Gilmore and Mollie Gilmore, had died intestate, seized in fee-simple of the lands of which partition was demanded.

Mrs. Melton and her husband answered in three paragraphs :

1. In general denial.

2. Setting up a verbal contract, by which, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fall v. HazelriggIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Frost v. TarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Moreland v. LemastersIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Stater v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Irwin v. State ex rel. SpooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Burns v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Worden v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Duteil v. MullensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Pond v. SheeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API