Legal Opinion

Frost v. Tarr

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Orange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Jane Tarr and her husband, Green Tarr, sued James Frost and Walter W.. Chisman, executors of the will of Simeon Frost. The complaint is in two paragraphs. It is alleged in the first paragraph, in substance, that in March, 1846, the deceased entered into a contract with the father of the female plaintiff, to take her into his family and to board, educate and clothe her as his own child, until she was twenty-one years old, or was married, or until the death of the said Simeon Frost, and that she should live with him and his family during such time, and if she did so, he would, at his death,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. JamiesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Bell v. Hewitt's ExecutorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Lee v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Pegram v. StortzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kiyose v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Peterson v. Estate of BauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Knight v. KnightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API