Honsinger v. Mulford
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court. Action by Willis T. Honsinger and others against John Mulford. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
On the conflicting evidence in this case, the jury were authorized to find that on September 2,1890, the Mutual Benefit Ice Company, a domestic corporation, was indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $6,000 then due, and that plaintiffs were about to commence an action upon said claim; that defendant was the principal stockholder in said corporation, and its president; that in an interview with two of the plaintiffs, at the date above mentioned, defendant requested them to extend the time of payment of said indebtedness, and agreed, if such extension was granted, to personally become liable for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Porter v. . WormserNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Wells v. . MonihanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Pennsylvania Coal Company v. . BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. LichtensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Fanger v. CasparyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Warth v. KastrinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Bennett v. MahlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Hardt v. RecknagelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.