Hardt v. Recknagel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Gustav A. Recknagel, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 4th day of March, 1901, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial before the court without a jury at the Hew York Trial Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
This action was brought to recover the sum of $2,000 and interest, alleged to have been loaned and advanced by the plaintiffs as copartners to and for the benefit .of the Montanye-Wells Company, and which the defendant promised and agreed to refund. It is averred in the complaint, as a first cause of aetion, “ that on or about the 17tli day of July, 1900, and in consideration of the plaintiffs advancing and loaning to the Montanye-Wells Company, a corporation, the sum of one thousand dollars, the defendant agreed in writing to refund to the plaintiffs said sum of one thousand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Evansville National Bank v. KaufmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Church v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Honsinger v. MulfordNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Honsinger v. . MulfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Warth v. KastrinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Banta v. BantaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Brooklyn Improvement Co. v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Kaye v. SternCity of New York Municipal Court · 1913
- Tetelman v. FultonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.