Legal Opinion

United States v. Burum

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 21, 1990No. ACMR 8902157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIUNTINI, Judge: *

The appellant was convicted of various offenses and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-seven months, and total forfeiture of pay and allowances. In return for appellant’s guilty plea, the convening authority had agreed to disapprove confinement in excess of eighteen months. The convening authority approved only sixteen months of confinement, forfeiture of all allowances, forfeiture of $420.00 pay per month for sixteen months, and a dishonorable discharge.

Prior to his court-martial, the appellant had been punished under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. BowenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. KrampfU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. GordonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. YarbroughU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. WrightU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API