Legal Opinion
Cloninger v. Finlaison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1916No. 2595PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
We find no error in the exclusion from the evidence of the plaintiff’s certificate of location. The Session Laws of Alaska, approved April 30, 1913, among other provisions require that, within 90 days from the date of discovery, the locator shall record with the recorder of the precinct in which the claim is situated a certificate of location, and that the certificate, among other things, shall set forth a description of the location of the claim with reference to “some natural object, permanent monument or well-known mining claim” (Laws 1913, c. 74, § 10),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Vogel v. WarsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Faxon v. BarnardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1880
- Washoe Copper Co. v. JunilaMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Van Buren v. McKinletIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flynn v. VevelstadDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- J. E. Riley Inv. Co. v. SakowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Sakow v. J. E. Riley Inv. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1939
- Sutherland v. PurdyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916