Legal Opinion

J. E. Riley Inv. Co. v. Sakow

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1938No. 8701PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, defendants below, and hereafter so named, appeal from a judgment in ejectment against them, the jury also awarding damages to appellee, plaintiff below, hereafter so named, for trespass in dredging gold from plaintiff’s “Good Hope” placer mining claim on Otter Creek, a tributary of the Iditarod River, Alaska.

Defendants’ answer denied plaintiff’s allegation that he owned the Good Hope claim; that defendants had trespassed on it, and that they had dredged the gold therefrom. The answer also alleged as an “affirmative defense” that Riley Investment Company was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Cloninger v. FinlaisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. Smith v. CascadenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. S. H. P. Vevelstad, William L. Pape, and Aurora Nickel Company, a Corporation v. E. Miles FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. J. E. Riley Inv. Co. v. SakowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. United States ex rel. Leong v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
  4. Sakow v. J. E. Riley Inv. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1939
  5. George v. LyonsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API