Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Purdy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1916No. 2583PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The questions presented by the writ of error on which this case comes here are whether under the act of Congress of August 1, 1912, a power of attorney, authorizing the location in Alaska of placer mining claims by one for another, is required to be recorded before any step in the matter of such location can be taken, and as to whether the court below erred in allowing parol proof of the contents of the power of attorney under which the placer mining claim in controversy was located for the defendant in error, Purdy, by one G. L. Gates. Subsequent to that location a part…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Sturtevant v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  3. Brewster v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Cloninger v. FinlaisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API