Legal Opinion

People v. Lown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2011No. Docket 139969PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

This case requires us to clarify the correct interpretation of the statutory “180-day rule” established by MCL 780.131 and MCL 780.133. The object of this rule is to dispose of new criminal charges against inmates in Michigan correctional facilities; the rule requires dismissal of the case if the prosecutor fails to commence action on charges pending against an inmate within 180 days after the Department of Corrections (DOC) delivers notice of the inmate’s imprisonment. We reaffirm that the rule does not require that a trial be commenced or completed within 180 days of the date notice was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. People v. GrimmettMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. McCAHAN v. BRENNANMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. DuenazMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API