Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Hiatt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1850PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Debt, upon an agreement under seal, for the payment of 200 dollars by the defendants to the plaintiffs. There are four pleas. The first is nil debet, to which a demurrer was sustaiúed. The second is a plea of payment. The third plea alleges that, before the commencement of the suit, the defendants sold and delivered to the plaintiffs one horse, gave them the use of another horse for the space of eighteen months, and paid them 100 dollars, in full satisfaction and discharge of said debt. The fourth is a plea of off-set. Issues were *323joined on replications traversing the three last mentioned…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. EdmonstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Trimble v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Yandes v. LefavourIndiana Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Davis v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mozingo v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Black v. KraussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Hamilton National Bank v. NyeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API