Trimble v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Delaware Circuit Court. The plaintiffs in error were the defendants below; and the demurrers to the pleas were general.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
This is an action of debt on a bastardy bond. The condition of the bond recites, that I. W. Trimble, one of *436the defendants in the Court below, was, at the April term of the Delaware Circuit Court, in the year 1832, arraigned to answer the state of Indiana, on the complaint.of Susanna Hobaugh, on a charge of bastardy; that at the said term, Trimble having pleaded not guilty, was found guilty by a jury impanelled to try the issue, and was adjudged to be the father of the child; that the Court thereupon entered judgment off the verdict, and ordered Trimble to pay to said Susanna the sum of 10…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Merwin v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
3Cited by16 opinions
- Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Borden v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Greenup v. CrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Capital Lumbering Co. v. LearnedOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Rowe v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.