Legal Opinion

Yandes v. Lefavour

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1830PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Assumpsit, in the name of Lefavour■ and Shryock against Yandes and Wilson, late partners in business, for work *372and labour. The first count is a general indebitatus assumpsit, the second a quantum meruit. The gist of the action is, that-the plaintiffs had jointly performed for the defendants work and labour as mill-wrights, for which they were to be paid the current price. This appears to have been the only joint concern in which the plaintiffs had been engaged. On the trial in the Circuit Court, the defendants offered in evidence, a letter written by Shryock, several years after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Keuren v. . ParmeleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Cowhick v. ShingleWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mozingo v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kirk v. HiattIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Dickerson v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API