Mozingo v. Ross
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.
This action was commenced by appellant on March 2, 1897, to recover a judgment on a promissory note, and also to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of land by the appellee, Moses M. Ross, to his co-appellee, Martha Price, and to subject the lands so conveyed to the payment of the judgment sought to be recovered upon thé note.
The note in suit appears to have been executed on December 20, 1882, by one Francis M. Ross, together with the appellee, Moses.M. Ross, to appellant, for the sum of $150.00, due in twelve months after the date thereof. The following partial payments seem to have…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Winchell v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Harper v. . FairleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Van Keuren v. . ParmeleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- McLaren v. . McMartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Shoemaker v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barrett v. SippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Koontz v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Nicholas v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Weidenhammer v. McAdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Northwest Thresher Co. v. DahltorpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.