Legal Opinion

King v. Zell & Merceret

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Wright, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

The appellees Zell & Merceret, who are stock brokers, obtained a judgment in the Baltimore City Court against the appellant Dr. E. F. King, for a balance due for certain stocks purchased for him, and he took the present appeal therefrom. The record contains four bills of exceptions, two to rulings on evidence and two to the Court’s action on the prayers.

There is evidence in the record tending to prove the following facts. On January 25th, 1900, Zell & Merceret purchased on margin for Dr. King, 10 shares of Cotton Duck common stock, and on February 8th, they purchased in the same manner for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. . WileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Jones v. MarksIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Dryden v. Zell & MerceretCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mount Vernon Brewing Co. v. TeschnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  2. Conservation Co. v. StimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  3. Kahn v. SchleisnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Krymski v. KupidlowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. W. M. Bell Co. v. EmbersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API