Legal Opinion

Krymski v. Kupidlowski

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 10, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore Oity Court (Dawkins, J.). Action by Lena Kupidlowski against Stanislaus Krymski. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is a suit for slander, and the appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The record contains three exceptions, the first and third of which are to rulings of the court below on the evidence, and the second to certain action of the court which the defeni lant has treated as a rejection of a prayer, offered by him at ‘¡lie conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, to take the case from the jury.

The plaintiff’s son, a young man of about eighteen years of age, had testified that he was with the plaintiff when she went to the store of the defendant to pay him a bill, the correctness…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barabasz v. KabatCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Bernheimer Bros. v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Baltimore & Ohio R. v. State Ex Rel. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Cowen v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. King v. Zell & MerceretCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mahan v. State Ex Rel. CarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. County Commissioners of Prince George's County v. TimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Cohen v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API