Legal Opinion

Conservation Co. v. Stimpson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 17, 1920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Ambles, J.).

1Opinion of the Court

Boyd, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a suit by the appellee against the appellant to ree cover commissions for services rendered in the purchase by the appellant of the capital stock of the Eureka. Life Insurance Company of Baltimore City, which he claims he was employed to procure- There are six common counts and one on a special contract in the declaration. The suit was brought under the Practice Act of Baltimore City, and the account attached to the declaration was for “commission 'earned at an agreed rate, 2%% of $460’,000 for services reoa•dered in the purchase by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. Fairfax Forrest Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  3. Henderson v. SyndicateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Dillard v. Olalla Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Carroll v. Manganese Steel Safe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Bright v. GanasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Duck v. Quality Custom Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Weil v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Cline v. Fountain Rock Lime & Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API