Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Schleisner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 1933No. [No. 35, April Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbkiks, J.

The testimony in this case tends to show, and it is uncontradicted, that some time in the month of April, 1929, the appellee approached the appellant and suggested that they buy shares of stock of the Central Aguirre Sugar Company, of the large earnings of which company appellee professed to have knowledge; that appellant at first hesitated about it, whereupon appellee said he would guarantee appellant against loss, and divide any profits that might arise out of the transaction; that appellant had no knowledge of this stock, but relied entirely on appellee; that following this discussion they…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hammaker v. SchleighCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. Speed v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Pentz v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Ady v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  5. Stewart v. SchallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. William Simmons and Viola Simmons, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. Industrial Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Baltimore Teachers Union v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Precision Development Co. v. Fast Bearing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API