Legal Opinion
Charlotte Housing Authority v. Patterson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 7, 1995No. 9326DC1269PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, John C., Judge.
The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court was correct in concluding that under 42 U.S.C. § 1437d(l)(5) a public housing tenant may not be evicted when she was not personally at fault for a breach of the lease by a member of her household. For reasons stated below, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
North Carolina law requires eviction of residential tenants to be accomplished through court action. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 42-25.6 (1994). In federally subsidized housing cases, the court decides whether applicable rules and regulations have been followed, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Avco Financial Services v. IsbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Memphis Housing Authority v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Rucker v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Rucker v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ann Arbor Housing Commission v. WellsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Housing Authority v. SpratleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.