Legal Opinion

Ann Arbor Housing Commission v. Wells

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2000No. Docket 208665PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Months after providing defendant a thirty-day notice of termination, plaintiff filed a complaint to terminate defendant’s tenancy in a federally subsidized public housing unit. A jury found in plaintiff’s favor, and the district court entered a judgment of eviction. Defendant appealed this judgment to the circuit court, which affirmed. Defendant now appeals by leave granted. We affirm.

i

Defendant rented from plaintiff a federally subsidized housing unit where she and her children have lived since 1991. In March or April 1996, defendant’s brother, who had been in a homeless shelter, moved into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faircloth v. Family Independence AgencyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Schueler v. WeintrobMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Charlotte Housing Authority v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Rucker v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Corduroy Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Memphis Housing Authority v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Etefia v. Credit Technologies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Wellston Housing Authority v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API