Legal Opinion

Priebisch v. Ottenwess

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1913No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kent; Cogger, J., presiding. Case by Max Priebisch against Bernard Ottenwess for fraud. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This case is brought before this court by defendant by writ of error to review a judgment of the circuit court for the county of Kent, entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff was a baker by trade, and had been working as such for defendant in his bakery in the city of Grand Rapids. He was a German, and did not understand or speak the English language. He is described by the defendant as a truthful, honest man. He had accumulated $500, which, on November 21, 1908, he loaned to defendant for one year at 5 per cent, interest, taking a promissory note therefor secured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fish ex rel. Smith v. BarbourMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Gensler v. NicholasMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Musselman Grocer Co. v. CaslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wilkinson v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynick v. Aldington & Curtis Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Storthz v. Midland Hills Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API