Legal Opinion

Storthz v. Midland Hills Land Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1936No. 4-4155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

This appeal comes from a decree of the Pulaski Chancery Court refusing to cancel restrictive covenants on certain real estate, and in granting an injunction prohibiting appellants from constructing a store building upon said property.

The pertinent facts necessary to an understanding of the issues involved are as follows: in 1926 appellants, Joe and Sam Storthz, purchased lots 3 to 8, inclusive, in block 6 of Midland Hills Addition to the city of Little Rock, and in each of the deeds conveying said property the following covenant appears:

“It is understood and agreed by the grantors herein, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. McClure v. . LeaycraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. JoynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Hays v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Hackett v. SteeleTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Owens v. CamfieldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Robertson v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API