Storthz v. Midland Hills Land Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.
This appeal comes from a decree of the Pulaski Chancery Court refusing to cancel restrictive covenants on certain real estate, and in granting an injunction prohibiting appellants from constructing a store building upon said property.
The pertinent facts necessary to an understanding of the issues involved are as follows: in 1926 appellants, Joe and Sam Storthz, purchased lots 3 to 8, inclusive, in block 6 of Midland Hills Addition to the city of Little Rock, and in each of the deeds conveying said property the following covenant appears:
“It is understood and agreed by the grantors herein, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- McClure v. . LeaycraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. JoynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Hays v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Hackett v. SteeleTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Owens v. CamfieldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Robertson v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970