Legal Opinion
Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc., Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1981No. 78-3270PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Winn-Proof Corporation, William Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc. appeal from a judgment of the district court finding claims 3-5 of United States Letters Patents No. 3,646,696 [“the ’696 patent”] valid and infringed. Appellee Robert Sarkisian cross-appeals from the court’s judgment finding United States Letter Patent No. 3,662,482 [“the ’482 patent”] invalid for double patenting. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of validity and infringement but reverse the finding as to double patenting.
The invention involved in this case is a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- David C. Turner, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Marketing Displays, Inc. v. TrafFix Devices, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.