Legal Opinion

Robert Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., William A. Werner, and Wer-Nel Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1983No. 78-3270, 78-3266PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

The original decision in this ease, which appeared at 662 F.2d 596 (9th Cir.1981), was withdrawn pending the Ninth Circuit’s en banc review of the question of the appropriate standard of patentability for mechanical combination patents. Three cases were consolidated in the en banc panel’s review: Sarkisian v. Winn-Proof Corp., 686 F.2d 671 (9th Cir.1981); Carson Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Carsonite International Corp., Inc., 658 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1981) and Hammerquist v. Clarke’s Sheet Metal, Inc., 658 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir.1981). In its decision, the en banc panel held that “a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Minton v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
  3. B.W.B. Controls, Inc. v. U.S. Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
  4. MAGICorp. v. Kinetic Presentations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  5. Bayer AG v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API