McDonald v. Maltz
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Cheboygan. (Pailthorp, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 78 Mich. 685.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This case was in this Court at the October term, 1889, and is reported in 78 Mich. 685, when the judgment was reversed, and a new trial ordered. The cause has again been tried, and, under the direction of the court, judgment entered in favor of the defendant.
The facts are fully set out in the former opinion, and do not materially differ from those appearing in the *173present record. The plaintiff had been acting as the agent, of Charles L. Ortman at different times in the sale of land. He met Ortman in Detroit, and commenced negotiations with him for the sale of certain lands, out of which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Siegel v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- Ranney v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Hannan v. PrentisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Myer v. Preferred Credit, Inc.Harrison County Court of Common Pleas · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.