Granger v. Sheriff
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Appeal by defendants from an order of the superior court of San Diego County denying their motion to vacate and set aside a sale of real estate under a decree of foreclosure. There is no brief on file for respondent. The judgment directed that the mortgaged premises “be sold at public auction in the manner provided by law by'the sheriff of the said county of San Diego,” and was embodied in the writ or order for its enforcement. Without notice to defendant, plaintiff’s attorney obtained an ex parte order of the court, which was entered in the minutes by the clerk as follows: “On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haynes v. MeeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Niles v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Martin v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Baldwin v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Fischer v. LukensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Crenshaw Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Nicholson v. CarrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.