Fischer v. Lukens
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an action to quiet title. The pla.i-ntiff had judgment in the trial court. Pacific Invest ments Incorporated (a corporation), one of the defendants, has appealed and has brought up all the evidence in a bill of exceptions. The evidence of the parties consists of written instruments. No witnesses were called by either party. Both parties claim to deraign title from Western Fuse and Explosives Company. On December 22, 1904, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against the Western Fuse and Explosives Company and later took out execution and caused the property involved in this action to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gashwiler v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Smith v. DallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Adams v. DohrmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Barney v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Granger v. SheriffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Golden v. McKimNevada Supreme Court · 1922
- Bellows v. Aliquot Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.