Legal Opinion

Crenshaw Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1919No. Civ. No. 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for an order recalling the remittitur, and to correct the judgment of the District Court of Appeal. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an application for an order recalling the remittitur, and, also, to correct the judgment of this court in the action made on the eighth day of April, 1919.

The judgment of the lower court from which the appeal was taken was for the principal sum of $3,163.50, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum, as follows: ... In reviewing the case, this court reached the conclusion that the amount of recovery should be the sum of $1,528.06, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum, as follows: . . . thus modifying the judgment and reducing the principal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rowland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Martin v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Municipal Bond Co. v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Roski v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Petersen v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Delorey v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API