Legal Opinion
Davis v. Reddy
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 15, 1980No. Appeal No. 80-506PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Interferences (board) awarding priority of counts 1-6, 8, and 9 in interference No. 98,661 to the junior party Reddy.1 We reverse.
*886 Background
The real parties in interest are Motorola, Inc., assignee of the senior party Davis et al., and the Bendix Corporation, assignee of the junior party Reddy.
The nine counts in the interference were copied by junior party Reddy into his patent application, serial No. 226,498, filed February 15, 1972, from the senior-party Davis et al. patent, No. 3,727,081,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kawai v. MetlesicsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Horwath v. LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Anderson v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Milton Oscar Schur and James C. Rickards v. Paul Adolf MullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Allen v. BlaisdellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Jean C. Kridl and Robert M. Goodman v. Francis P. McCormick Kenneth A. Barton, and William F. SwainCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- EMC Corp. v. Pure Storage, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Reg Synthetic Fuels, LLC v. Neste Oil OyjCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.