Schott v. Schott

Two actions were commenced by the plaintiff against the defendant. One was an action instituted in the superior court for the partition of three parcels of land situated in the city of Los Angeles, the plaintiff claiming that he and the defendant were the owners thereof in joint tenancy. The other action was one for the recovery of certain rents and profits for one of said parcels, instituted in the justice’s court, and transferred to the superior court for the reason that the defendant claimed that title to the real property was involved therein. By consent the actions were consolidated and…