Legal Opinion

Alisha Ann Murphy v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2014No. 40483PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

Alisha Ann Murphy petitioned this Court for review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion regarding her successive petition for post-conviction relief in Murphy v. State, No. 37254, 2012 WL 9189252 (Idaho Ct.App. July 26, 2012). On appeal, Murphy argued that the district court erred in denying her request for counsel, summarily dismissing her successive petition, and denying her I.R.C.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. She argued that her ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims were properly before the district court on successive petition because, under this Court’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. House v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. ZareskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. Sarah Marie Johnson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Woodrow Grant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Dale Carter Shackelford v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Andrus v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API